Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2021 - Volume 15 [Issue 4]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Comparative Performance of ARIMA and GARCH Model in Forecasting Crude Oil Price Data

  • Atanu, Enebi Yahaya
  • Ette, Harrison Etuk
  • Amos, Emeka

Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, Page 251-275
DOI: 10.9734/ajpas/2021/v15i430378
Published: 17 December 2021

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


This study compares the performance of Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity models in forecasting Crude Oil Price data as obtained from (CBN 2019) Statistical Bulletin.  The forecasting of Crude Oil Price, plays an important role in decision making for the Nigeria government and all other sectors of her economy. Crude Oil Prices are volatile time series data, as they have huge price swings in a shortage or an oversupply period. In this study, we use two time series models which are Box-Jenkins Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heterocedasticity (GARCH) models in modelling and forecasting Crude Oil Prices. The statistical analysis was performed by the use of time plot to display the trend of the data, Autocorrelation Function (ACF), Partial Autocorrelation Functions (PACF), Dickey-Fuller test for stationarity, forecasting was done based on the best fit models for both ARIMA and GARCH models. Our result shows that ARIMA (3, 1, 2) is the best ARIMA model to forecast monthly Crude Oil Price and we also found GARCH (1, 1) model is the best GARCH model and using a specified set of parameters, GARCH (1, 1) model is the best fit for our concerned data set.


Keywords:
  • Crude oil
  • oil price
  • ARIMA
  • GARCH
  • modeling.
  • Full Article – PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Yahaya, A. E., Etuk, E. H., & Emeka, A. (2021). Comparative Performance of ARIMA and GARCH Model in Forecasting Crude Oil Price Data. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 15(4), 251-275. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2021/v15i430378
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Dharam PG. The political economy of oil gas in Africa. The case of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria: Taylor and Francis Publishers; 1991.

Akpan EO. Oil Price Shocks and Nigeria’s Macro economy. paper presented at the Annual Conference of case. Economic Development in Africa, 22nd-24th March, Oxford; 2009.

Liu LM. Journal of Forecasting. 1991;10 (5):521-547.

Agnolucci P. Volatility in crude oil futures: Α comparison of the predictive ability of GARCH and implied volatility models. Energy Economics. 2009;31(2):316-321.

Ahmad MI. Modeling and forecasting Oman crude oil prices using Box-Jenkins techniques. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets. 2012;5:24-30.

Etuk, Ette Harrison. Seasonal ARIMA modelling of Nigerian monthly crude oil prices. Asian Economic and Financial Review. 2013;3(3):333-340.

Sadorsky P. Modeling and forecasting petroleum futures volatility. Energy Economics. 2006;28(4):467-488.

Hou A, Suardi S. A Nonparametric GARCH Model of Crude Oil Price Return Volatility. Energy Economics. 2012;34(2):618-626.

Ahmed RA, Shabri AB. Fitting GARCH Models to Crude Oil Spot Price Data. Life Science Journal. 2013;10(4).

Box GEP, Jenkins GM. “time series analysis: forecasting and control,” Holden-day, san Francisco; 1976.

Engle RF. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of u.k. Inflation. Econometrica. 1982;50:987–1008.

Borellslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 1986; 31:307–327.

Judge GG, Hill RC, Griffiths WE, Gotkepohl H, Lee T. Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics.1988;1024 p. Edition:2. Ed.

Somarajan S, Shankar M, Sharma T, Jeyanthi R. Modelling and analysis of volatility in time series data. In: Wang J., Reddy G., Prasad V., Reddy V. (eds) Soft Computing and Signal Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019;898. Springer, Singapore. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3393-4_62

Salisu AA, Fasanya IO. Comparative performance of volatility models for oil price. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2012;2(3):167-183.

Muhammed G, Umar Bashir F. The relevance of GARCH-family models in forecasting Nigerian oil price volatility. Bullion. 2018;42(2). CBN publication, April-June.

Bamisaye OA, Obiyan AS. Policy analysis of oil sector in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2006.
Available: http://eurojournals.com/ejss%203%201.pdf#page=43.

Uwilingiyimana, Charline, Tu, Joseph, Harerimana Jean. Forecasting inflation in Kenya using ARIMA -GARCH models. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations. 2015;3:2348- 758515.

Gencer GH, Musoglu Z. Volatility modeling and forecasting of Istanbul gold exchange (IGE). International Journal of Financial Research. Published by Sciedu Press. 2014;5(2):87-101. Available:www.sciedu.ca/ijfr

Yahaya AE, Etuk EH, Kingdom N, Chimee NW. ARIMA model for gross domestic product (GDP): Evidence from Nigeria. Archives of Current Research International. 2020;20(7):49-61.

Yaziz SR, Ahmad MH, Nian LC, Muhammad N. A comparative study on Box-Jenkins and GARCH Models in forecasting crude oil prices. Journal of Applied Science. 2011;11(7):1129-1135. ISSN 1812-5654.

Shabri A, Samsudin R. Crude oil price forecasting based on hybridizing wavelet multiple linear regression model, particle swarm optimization techniques and principal component analysis. Science World Journal. 2014;May 8.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/854520
  • Abstract View: 225 times
    PDF Download: 110 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics. All rights reserved.